# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `KCD2 - 5080` with an average FPS of 112.78%, which is 31.84% higher than the `KCD2 - 9070XT` run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `KCD2 - 5080` with a standard deviation of 2.11 and a variance of 4.44, which is 7.69% lower in standard deviation and 15.49% lower in variance compared to the `KCD2 - 9070XT` run. * **Best overall**: `KCD2 - 5080` as it has the highest FPS with a relatively low standard deviation and variance, indicating a more stable and consistent performance. # Issues: * The `KCD2 - 9070XT` run has a significantly lower FPS, around 24.19% lower than the `KCD2 - 5080` run. This can be observed from the "FPS: Mean" value. * The `KCD2 - 9070XT` run also has a higher frame time, around 31.81% higher than the `KCD2 - 5080` run, as seen in the "Frame time: Mean" value. * The `KCD2 - 9070XT` run has a higher CPU load, around 23.20% higher than the `KCD2 - 5080` run, as shown in the "CPU load: Mean" value. * The `KCD2 - 9070XT` run has a higher GPU temperature, around 11.14% higher than the `KCD2 - 5080` run, as seen in the "GPU temp: Mean" value. # Summary The benchmark data suggests that the `KCD2 - 5080` run outperforms the `KCD2 - 9070XT` run in terms of higher FPS, lower frame time, lower CPU load, and lower GPU temperature. The `KCD2 - 5080` run also exhibits a more stable and consistent performance, as indicated by its lower standard deviation and variance in FPS. While both runs use the same CPU and RAM configuration, the difference in GPU performance and power consumption likely contributes to the observed differences in overall system performance.