# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Obliv Remaster - Mesa git` run with an average FPS of 60.99% higher than the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run with a standard deviation of FPS of 60.25% lower than the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa git` run, indicating a more consistent and smoother frame rate. * **Best overall**: `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run, as it has a slightly lower average FPS (around 5% lower) compared to the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa git` run, but has significantly better stability with 60.25% lower standard deviation in FPS, resulting in a more consistent and playable experience. # Issues: * The `Obliv Remaster - Mesa git` run has a significantly higher CPU load (around 62% higher) and CPU temperature (around 10% higher) compared to the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run, despite using the same hardware and software configuration. This indicates that the newer git version of Mesa is more demanding on the CPU, which could potentially lead to thermal throttling and performance issues in longer gameplay sessions. # Summary The benchmark data provided a comparison between the performance of the Obliv Remaster game using the `Mesa stable` and `Mesa git` drivers on the same hardware configuration. The `Obliv Remaster - Mesa git` run achieved a significantly higher average FPS of around 60.99% compared to the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run, but at the cost of higher CPU load and temperature. On the other hand, the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run exhibited a more consistent and smoother frame rate with a 60.25% lower standard deviation in FPS, suggesting a more stable and reliable gaming experience. Overall, the `Obliv Remaster - Mesa stable` run appears to be the better choice, as the slight decrease in average FPS is offset by the significant improvement in frame rate consistency and reduced CPU/thermal stress.