# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Atomfall - GNOME` with 91.84% higher FPS than the lowest run * **Smoothest FPS**: `Atomfall - Hyprland` with 10.22% lower FPS standard deviation and 17.54% lower FPS variance than the highest run * **Best overall**: `Atomfall - Hyprland` as it has a good balance between high FPS (only 0.45% lower than the highest run) and low FPS standard deviation and variance. # Issues: * The `Atomfall - KDE` run has significantly higher CPU load (11.02% higher than the lowest run), CPU temperature (20.26% higher than the lowest run), and GPU VRAM usage (1.77% higher than the highest run) compared to the other runs. This indicates that the KDE desktop environment may be less optimized for this benchmark compared to the other environments. * The `Atomfall - COSMIC` run has slightly lower FPS (0.65% lower than the highest run) and higher FPS standard deviation (9.35% higher than the lowest run) compared to the other runs, which suggests it may not be the best performer. # Summary The benchmark results show that the `Atomfall` game performs well across different Linux desktop environments, with the `Atomfall - Hyprland` run being the best overall performer. It achieves a high FPS while maintaining low FPS standard deviation and variance, indicating a smooth and stable experience. The `Atomfall - GNOME` run has the highest FPS, but with slightly higher FPS standard deviation and variance. The `Atomfall - KDE` run, on the other hand, exhibits higher CPU and GPU resource utilization, which may lead to a less optimized experience. Overall, the results suggest that the *Hyprland* and *GNOME* desktop environments provide the best performance for the `Atomfall` game on the tested hardware.