Benchmark #45

Download
Valheim Cachy vs Pika lavd_perf

Submitted 1 year ago by originalhugo

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
valheim_lavd_per_cachy Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.14.8-2-cachyos performance
valheim_lavd_perf_pika Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (RADV NAVI22) AMD Ryzen 5 5600 6-Core Processor 17 GB 6.14.7-pikaos performance
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `valheim_lavd_perf_pika` run with a mean FPS of 104.77, which is 1.8% higher than the `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run with a standard deviation of 8.98 in FPS, which is 46.9% lower than the `valheim_lavd_perf_pika` run. * **Best overall**: `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run, as it has a lower standard deviation in FPS, indicating more stable performance, while the difference in mean FPS is only 1.8%. # Issues: * The `valheim_lavd_perf_pika` run has a significantly higher standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating less stable performance compared to the `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run. # Summary The benchmark data compares two different Linux kernel and scheduler configurations for running the game Valheim. The `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run uses the CachyOS kernel and the `performance` scheduler, while the `valheim_lavd_perf_pika` run uses the PikaOS kernel and the same `performance` scheduler. Based on the data provided, the `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` run provides the best overall performance, with slightly lower mean FPS but significantly more stable frametimes and lower CPU/GPU utilization. The `valheim_lavd_perf_pika` run achieves a higher peak FPS, but at the cost of increased variability in frametimes, which could lead to a less smooth gaming experience. Overall, the `valheim_lavd_per_cachy` configuration appears to be the better choice for this benchmark, as it balances performance and stability.