# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Oblivion Remaster - lavd` with an average FPS of 88.77%, which is around 1.2% higher than the lowest performing run. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Oblivion Remaster - Flash` with a standard deviation of 2.35% in FPS, which is around 12% lower than the highest FPS run. * **Best overall**: `Oblivion Remaster - lavd` with a slightly lower standard deviation of 2.32% in FPS compared to the "Smoothest FPS" run, while maintaining a high average FPS. # Issues: * The `Oblivion Remaster - Flash` run has significantly lower GPU core clock and GPU memory clock speeds compared to the other runs, which could be the reason for its slightly lower average FPS. * The `Oblivion Remaster - BORE` run has a higher standard deviation and variance in FPS, which indicates less stable performance compared to the other runs. # Summary The benchmark results show a comparison of different Linux kernel schedulers (`powersave`) on the Oblivion Remaster game. The hardware configuration, including the `NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090` GPU and `AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor`, remained the same across all runs. The `Oblivion Remaster - lavd` scheduler appears to provide the best overall performance, with the highest average FPS and relatively low standard deviation, indicating a good balance between performance and stability. The `Oblivion Remaster - Flash` run, on the other hand, had slightly lower GPU clock speeds, which likely contributed to its slightly lower average FPS. The `Oblivion Remaster - BORE` run exhibited less stable performance compared to the others. Overall, the results suggest that the `lavd` scheduler is the most suitable choice for this particular game and hardware configuration.