Benchmark #50

Download
Oblivion Remaster: Scheds 2

Submitted 11 months ago by ferreo

Specifications
Label OS GPU CPU RAM OS specific
Oblivion Remaster - BORE Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.3-pikaos powersave
Oblivion Remaster - bpfland Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.3-pikaos powersave
Oblivion Remaster - Flash Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.3-pikaos powersave
Oblivion Remaster - lavd Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.3-pikaos powersave
Oblivion Remaster - p2dq Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor 67 GB 6.15.3-pikaos powersave
# Top runs: * **Highest FPS**: `Oblivion Remaster - Flash` has the highest average FPS at 88.69%, which is approximately 1.2% higher than the other runs. * **Smoothest FPS**: `Oblivion Remaster - lavd` has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS, indicating the smoothest frame delivery. * **Best overall**: `Oblivion Remaster - lavd` is the best overall, as it has the lowest standard deviation and variance in FPS while maintaining a high average FPS, only slightly lower than the `Oblivion Remaster - Flash` run. # Issues: * The `Oblivion Remaster - p2dq` run has significantly higher CPU load, CPU temperature, and GPU memory clock compared to the other runs. This suggests there may be an issue with this configuration or some additional system load that is not part of the benchmark. # Summary The `Oblivion Remaster: Scheds 2` benchmark compares the performance of the game running on different Linux kernel schedulers. The benchmark was conducted on a system with an AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 16-Core Processor, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 GPU, and 67 GB of RAM, all running on the Steam Runtime 3 (sniper) operating system with the 6.15.3-pikaos Linux kernel. The results show that the `scx_lavd` scheduler provides the best overall performance, with high average FPS and the smoothest frame delivery as indicated by the low standard deviation and variance. The `scx_Flash` scheduler also performs well, with the highest average FPS, but it has slightly higher frame time variability compared to `scx_lavd`. The `scx_p2dq` scheduler appears to have some issues, with significantly higher CPU load, CPU temperature, and GPU memory clock compared to the other configurations. This suggests that there may be some additional system load or configuration differences that are not directly part of the benchmark comparison.